Search for: "MGN International, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
The Court went on to state that: “national courts are intrinsically better able to assess the adequacy of an award in their jurisdiction than an international body. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
Nimchuk Inc. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
MGN has failed in its attempt to obtain summary judgment in the managed phone hacking litigation. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On 8 March 2023 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Various Claimants v MGN before Fancourt J. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Legal Aid Ontario, 2014 ONSC 6136 Gulati & Ors v MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch) (21 May 2015) Google Inc v Vidal-Hall & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) Hopkins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Data Protection Commissioner [2015] EUECJ C 362/14 (06 October 2015) In the Matter of A Policy Grievance Concerning the Contracting Out of Email and Calendar Services and Violation of the Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act Condon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
As Privacy International pointed out in a press statement, “After years of downplaying, obscuring, and denying the Snowden revelations, the Government has finally entered the conversation. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Representative Claimants v MGN ([2015] EWCA Civ 1291). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
On 15 February 2019 Norris J handed down judgment in the case of Winstone v MGN [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) [pdf] He held that MGN was not entitled to claim privilege in respect of comments made by the Chairman of Trinity Mirror after an AGM. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
The decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, In Re Google Inc, Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation [pdf] was handed down on 10 November 2015. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for 'grey area' disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA: Skilled reader 'taken to know patent law'; patent… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for 'grey area' disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA: Skilled reader 'taken to know patent law'; patent… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
Canada In the case of Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
Traditionally, in International Shoe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
From the blogs The comedian Robin Ince discusses the recent controversy around Ricky Gervais’s tweets. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for ‘grey area’ disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA:… [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
If his name was mentioned to them, national and international politicians would probably ask, “Who’s he? [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In other words, it appears that the preferred course is for the United Kingdom to remain a party the Convention and therefore bound by it as a matter of international law. [read post]
